|
May 11
May 11, 2001
In This Issue:
"Unprecedented" New Cancer Drug,
Pain Meds, Advocates Sue Pharmaceutical Company,
Women Wait for Treatment, and more on Gleevac.
**********************************************
THE LATEST NEWS
New Drug Called Unprecedented In Reducing Cancer Cells
Pain Meds Don't Reduce Survival
Some Women Have To Wait For Treatment
Patient Advocates Sue Pharmaceutical Company
***********************************************
NEW CANCER DRUG HAILED AS WAVE OF THE FUTURE
HHS Secretary Tommy G. Thompson and the Food and Drug Administration today announced the approval of the drug Gleevec,
a promising new oral treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a rare and life-threatening form of cancer.
Gleevec has been shown to reduce substantially the level of cancerous cells in the bone marrow and blood of treated patients.
Questions and answers about the drug, as well as other related information, is available on the National Cancer Institute Web site.
For more information, see the FDA announcement:
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2001/NEW00759.html
***********************************************
GLEEVAC CLINICAL TRIALS
The previous clinical trials on Gleevac (generic: STI 151) were designed to evaluate whether it was safe, not
whether Gleevec improves survival. Researchers are currently selecting patients for follow-up studies necessary
to confirm clinical effects of Gleevec over time. According to the drug-maker, Novartis, they will create a patient
assistance program, which could cost $2,000 to 4,000 per month. Watch the cancerpage.com news section and this
newsletter for more information.
***********************************************
THE NEED FOR SECOND OPINION OF PATHOLOGISTS
ABC reported Tuesday, that researchers at The Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore reviewed
tissue samples from 6,000 cancer patients across the country and they found one out of every 71
cases was misdiagnosed. For example, when a biopsy was labeled cancerous when it was not. In addition,
up to one of every five cancer cases was misclassified. See the ABC story.
Many patients may need a second opinion from a pathologist, which is why cancerpage has links
throughout the site to a source of second opinions at Find Cancer Experts.
|